The navigator of Klee.
"There is differ "
Gabriel Tarde
Gabriel Tarde
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Best Breasts In Bollywood
esquiZiado
Basically I have compiled excerpts from the book of Deleuze" Pericles and Verdi. The Philosophy of François Châtelet "so you can consideréis agencies as appropriate. The book I bought in Paris, so excuse me if some sentences are not" literal "as it is known that there are certain expressions and translate syntactic structures that do not allow that is passed from one language to another as if such a thing. Anyway, here you have:
"Immanence, the field of immanence is a power-Acto. The two concepts exist only in correlation inseparable. "
" The reason is not an option, but a process, and is precisely to upgrade a power or being a subject. There is a pluralism of reason, because there is no reason to think the matter or act as unique. "
" is defined or invent a process of rationalization every time establishing human relations in any field in a any set in a multiplicity anyone. The event, being related, is always political, reason and process is political. "
" There is psychology, but a policy of self. There is not a metaphysical but a policy of being. No science, but a policy matter, since man is charged with the matter itself. "
" The human ear when the object becomes sound becomes music. "
" Making the match between men a ritual, a kind of ritual of immanence, even if it lacks a bit of schizophrenia. "
"There is no pure reason or rationality par excellence. Rationalization processes are heterogeneous, very different following the transformations, ages, groups and individuals. "
" Knowledge is the art itself in power. "
" When we state a single reason, universal law fall precisely in that it calls Châtelet outrecuidance *, a sort of lack of education metaphysics. This is indeed the case in Plato, but even when it is recognized in human reason and human only the end of man, still remains a theological significance. Instead of a plurality of processors we dress a dualism that opposes the discourse of violence, as if the violence did not continue nesting in the same speech, feeding and motivations of meanders. "
" The abstract does not explain anything, is he who must be explained, the universal does not exist, there is the singular, the singularity. The uniqueness is not the individual, is the case, the event, potential, or rather the distribution of the potential in a given subject. "
" Upgrading the power or becoming active. "
Everything philosopher who invoked the concrete has always claimed 'make the move', rather than thinking abstraction of the universal [...] the problem is not the end but the movement. The movement and the act of power. Deciding not want to make the move, but do it. "
* excessive self-confidence, pride, presumption. Impertinent boldness towards another; audacity.
"Immanence, the field of immanence is a power-Acto. The two concepts exist only in correlation inseparable. "
" The reason is not an option, but a process, and is precisely to upgrade a power or being a subject. There is a pluralism of reason, because there is no reason to think the matter or act as unique. "
" is defined or invent a process of rationalization every time establishing human relations in any field in a any set in a multiplicity anyone. The event, being related, is always political, reason and process is political. "
" There is psychology, but a policy of self. There is not a metaphysical but a policy of being. No science, but a policy matter, since man is charged with the matter itself. "
" The human ear when the object becomes sound becomes music. "
" Making the match between men a ritual, a kind of ritual of immanence, even if it lacks a bit of schizophrenia. "
"There is no pure reason or rationality par excellence. Rationalization processes are heterogeneous, very different following the transformations, ages, groups and individuals. "
" Knowledge is the art itself in power. "
" When we state a single reason, universal law fall precisely in that it calls Châtelet outrecuidance *, a sort of lack of education metaphysics. This is indeed the case in Plato, but even when it is recognized in human reason and human only the end of man, still remains a theological significance. Instead of a plurality of processors we dress a dualism that opposes the discourse of violence, as if the violence did not continue nesting in the same speech, feeding and motivations of meanders. "
" The abstract does not explain anything, is he who must be explained, the universal does not exist, there is the singular, the singularity. The uniqueness is not the individual, is the case, the event, potential, or rather the distribution of the potential in a given subject. "
" Upgrading the power or becoming active. "
Everything philosopher who invoked the concrete has always claimed 'make the move', rather than thinking abstraction of the universal [...] the problem is not the end but the movement. The movement and the act of power. Deciding not want to make the move, but do it. "
* excessive self-confidence, pride, presumption. Impertinent boldness towards another; audacity.
What Should Period Blood Look Like?
Cyborg Ontology
By Teresa Aguilar book "Cyborg Ontology" and exposure to different positions on the becoming-cyborg thought that perhaps in the chapter on transhumanism in sight a "trans" something different from the " abolish the body as when consciousness pure information is downloaded to the network can do without it. "
The cyborg is a monster indeed, a demontruosité, freak shows, but it seems that it must be superseded by a hyper and information that resonates pure Hegelianism, among other things, opposing the body awareness and by appealing to a synthesis whose result should be the abolition, the abolition body:
"Transhumanism is poses a transcendental, abstract, pure, for which do not need a human anchor of organic, but rather it is resolved impediment to post-biological existence as is necessary deletion. "
And also:
" Human beings define as post-human [...] They would have been rid of all dependence on biological parts. "Haraway
however, is more cautious here:
" The cyborg is text, machine, body and metaphor, all theorized and immersed in communications. "
The body (and as we speak we seem to refer to meat) should be destroyed or abandoned, like a shell. I think the body, from the perspective of Augmented Reality is the opening to a plus of reality and the substantial improvement of the body and, therefore, of consciousness he also afoot. The issue of metal ratio (technology)-body (meat) that should be kept to avoid isolation of the World and to avoid being at once too subject to it is a paradigm that presents important. We should not think as if percentages are involved. This put us more in a humanist ethical level by asking "how much risk our own nature." I see no good that the issue be raised in terms of ratios of access intangible information or receptivity pure transhumanist style. In this sense, the debate would revolve constantly around a center of gravity and communicative linguistic idealist (not abstract), namely: The perfect channel, the transmitter-receiver perfect and the perfect message.
On one side of the scale, human flesh, on the other, steak ideal information. What is happening in the middle is the figure of a cyborg that looks a haven for information or operate with the melancholy of what was or might have been. A cyborg that focuses on an Augmented Reality from a virtualization-update the same data through specific devices and materials, no doubt, open to new combinations and recombinations that generate active affects and liabilities and in any case involving an excess of reality in continuous open and catch.
Returning to the subject matter-body, it is important to distinguish between body and body-conformant the affecting-affected.
The body is imperfect when compared (input X fascinated by technological readiness) with technical machines, precise production, not decadent rhythm and pace of order execution quickly, can be automated or scheduled. Not that you try to compare "different natures, but to compare entities that qualitatively differ in form, content, expression and production.
This fascination takes the allopoietic idealistic basis or at least, as if the information was only relevant and worthy of being treated / procesuada in the foreground. Pure information is still seen as baptism of the cyborg. It is true that says we're in the information society, but even given this, of course, there is a infosphere that in no way abstraería from other areas, but in reality, is really connected. This infosphere is especially relevant in the new economy and business development dotcom or the commercial aspect and stock market performance of firms that operate directly on the Web
The infosphere also succumbs -How could it be otherwise, the settlement of "land" cyberspace, either through domain and speculation with them, either through acquisition of addresses (names of websites). In this case, the information is put in brackets for that product that will be released soon (any product) and need a trade name or brand. The brand name is less distinctive information encompasses information that other shows to be noticed.
Why talk about business and capitalism at the same time Augmented Reality and transhumanism? Essentially for three reasons:
a) The capitalist wants the deterritorialised transhumanism absolute deterritorialization of consciousness. Both are on the website the "new promised land" where to continue and complete their routine.
b) The cyborg is the semi-schizoid Network and post-humanism. The cyborg was machine and is now coupling allopoietic machine that will enhance autopoiesis chaosmosis Guattari explains.
c) Capitalism and the cyborg are infected each other. The cyborg approach should be known to infect without being infected by the antidote that would annul or encoded, either in the plane cyberspace or in the non-territorial cyberspace.
can not know what the body, and instead to promote and discover the power-coupling exogenous-endogenous, almost like making it disappear, subtly or directly for pure informational. Are many positive contributions to this paradigm, and it is compounded by the physiognomy, so forgotten today.
The cyborg is a monster indeed, a demontruosité, freak shows, but it seems that it must be superseded by a hyper and information that resonates pure Hegelianism, among other things, opposing the body awareness and by appealing to a synthesis whose result should be the abolition, the abolition body:
"Transhumanism is poses a transcendental, abstract, pure, for which do not need a human anchor of organic, but rather it is resolved impediment to post-biological existence as is necessary deletion. "
And also:
" Human beings define as post-human [...] They would have been rid of all dependence on biological parts. "Haraway
however, is more cautious here:
" The cyborg is text, machine, body and metaphor, all theorized and immersed in communications. "
The body (and as we speak we seem to refer to meat) should be destroyed or abandoned, like a shell. I think the body, from the perspective of Augmented Reality is the opening to a plus of reality and the substantial improvement of the body and, therefore, of consciousness he also afoot. The issue of metal ratio (technology)-body (meat) that should be kept to avoid isolation of the World and to avoid being at once too subject to it is a paradigm that presents important. We should not think as if percentages are involved. This put us more in a humanist ethical level by asking "how much risk our own nature." I see no good that the issue be raised in terms of ratios of access intangible information or receptivity pure transhumanist style. In this sense, the debate would revolve constantly around a center of gravity and communicative linguistic idealist (not abstract), namely: The perfect channel, the transmitter-receiver perfect and the perfect message.
On one side of the scale, human flesh, on the other, steak ideal information. What is happening in the middle is the figure of a cyborg that looks a haven for information or operate with the melancholy of what was or might have been. A cyborg that focuses on an Augmented Reality from a virtualization-update the same data through specific devices and materials, no doubt, open to new combinations and recombinations that generate active affects and liabilities and in any case involving an excess of reality in continuous open and catch.
Returning to the subject matter-body, it is important to distinguish between body and body-conformant the affecting-affected.
The body is imperfect when compared (input X fascinated by technological readiness) with technical machines, precise production, not decadent rhythm and pace of order execution quickly, can be automated or scheduled. Not that you try to compare "different natures, but to compare entities that qualitatively differ in form, content, expression and production.
This fascination takes the allopoietic idealistic basis or at least, as if the information was only relevant and worthy of being treated / procesuada in the foreground. Pure information is still seen as baptism of the cyborg. It is true that says we're in the information society, but even given this, of course, there is a infosphere that in no way abstraería from other areas, but in reality, is really connected. This infosphere is especially relevant in the new economy and business development dotcom or the commercial aspect and stock market performance of firms that operate directly on the Web
The infosphere also succumbs -How could it be otherwise, the settlement of "land" cyberspace, either through domain and speculation with them, either through acquisition of addresses (names of websites). In this case, the information is put in brackets for that product that will be released soon (any product) and need a trade name or brand. The brand name is less distinctive information encompasses information that other shows to be noticed.
Why talk about business and capitalism at the same time Augmented Reality and transhumanism? Essentially for three reasons:
a) The capitalist wants the deterritorialised transhumanism absolute deterritorialization of consciousness. Both are on the website the "new promised land" where to continue and complete their routine.
b) The cyborg is the semi-schizoid Network and post-humanism. The cyborg was machine and is now coupling allopoietic machine that will enhance autopoiesis chaosmosis Guattari explains.
c) Capitalism and the cyborg are infected each other. The cyborg approach should be known to infect without being infected by the antidote that would annul or encoded, either in the plane cyberspace or in the non-territorial cyberspace.
can not know what the body, and instead to promote and discover the power-coupling exogenous-endogenous, almost like making it disappear, subtly or directly for pure informational. Are many positive contributions to this paradigm, and it is compounded by the physiognomy, so forgotten today.
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Women Who Can Pin Men Down
new tensioner
I should add, in reference to the first post that in the book Kafka, Deleuze and Guattari, the concept of tensor refers specifically to using Lyotard. Is the relationship established between the libido and intensity.
How To Schedule A Business Objects
f. Psychoanalytic term that indicates a reversal conscious or unconscious psychic energy into an idea, object or person.
The correlative opposite cathexis is acatexis : f. Lack of feelings related to an emotionally charged issue, denotes, in psychoanalysis, detachment or transfer of emotions and ideas.
"What revolution is the temptation to turn against their subject groups, described as anarchists, and balance?" Averting the deadly slope that passes a group of his revolutionary libidinal cathexis to cathexis revolutionary and are nothing more than preconscious or interest, then to preconscious cathexis and are only reformers? And yet, where do you put this or that group? Was there ever unconscious cathexis revolutionary? "
"What revolution is the temptation to turn against their subject groups, described as anarchists, and balance?" Averting the deadly slope that passes a group of his revolutionary libidinal cathexis to cathexis revolutionary and are nothing more than preconscious or interest, then to preconscious cathexis and are only reformers? And yet, where do you put this or that group? Was there ever unconscious cathexis revolutionary? "
Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia [1972]. Trad. Esp. Buenos Aires: Polity Press, 2005.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Is Vladmodels Illegal In Uk
cathexis mapping tensors in
In mathematics a tensor is a kind of algebraic entity of several components, which generalizes the concepts of scale , vector and matrix in a way that is independent of any coordinate system chosen. The tensors are of particular importance in physical .
tensors can be represented by a matrix of components in some cases.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)